Arc Welding vs. Submerged Arc Welding Steel Pipe Process Comparison, Weld Performance, and Complete Procurement Selection Guide

Applicable Fields: Oil & Gas · Pressure Vessels · Chemical Processing · Power Engineering · Offshore Engineering · Structural Engineering

In industries such as oil and gas, pressure vessels, chemicals, power, and offshore engineering, welding quality directly determines a steel pipe’s safety, durability, and project operating costs. Arc Welding and Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) are the two most widely used welding technologies in steel pipe manufacturing—the former excels in flexibility, while the latter has become the mainstream process for producing large-diameter, high-pressure steel pipes due to its high level of automation and consistent weld quality.

This article provides a comprehensive technical reference covering process principles, performance comparisons, analysis of 4 key sub-processes, weld quality risks, NDT inspection standards, and selection decision-making—helping procurement managers and engineers mitigate selection risks and make well-informed purchasing decisions

IMG 20250225 102536 1IMG 20250704 113828 scaled

Arc Welding & Submerged Arc Welding: Process Principles Overview

1.1 Arc Welding and Its 4 Major Sub-processes

Arc welding utilizes the high heat generated by an electric arc to melt the base metal and filler material, forming a permanent joint. Based on specific execution methods, it is mainly divided into the following 4 categories:

 
Sub-process Full Name Characteristics Typical Applications
SMAW Shielded Metal Arc Welding (Stick) Simple equipment, highest flexibility, highly dependent on welder skill On-site welding, maintenance, low-volume fabrication
GMAW Gas Metal Arc Welding (MIG/MAG) Higher efficiency, low spatter, suitable for semi-automation Steel structures, storage tanks, pipeline installation
GTAW Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (TIG) Highest weld quality, slow welding speed, higher cost Stainless steel precision tubes, high-cleanliness systems
FCAW Flux-Cored Arc Welding High efficiency, all-position welding, suitable for thick plates Heavy steel structures, shipbuilding, bridges

1.2 Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) and Differences Between LSAW / SSAW

Submerged Arc Welding is completed under a protective layer of granular flux. The arc is invisible, heat input is uniform, and weld quality is consistent, making it the preferred process for industrial large-diameter steel pipe production.

 
Type Weld Seam Form Primary Advantages Applicable Scenarios
LSAW Longitudinal Seam High dimensional accuracy, uniform wall thickness, short weld length High-pressure pipelines, API 5L X65/X70, LNG
SSAW Spiral Seam Flexible manufacturing, multiple diameters produced from the same plate width Water conservancy, non-high-pressure transport, large-diameter structural pipes

Typical Applicable Standards: ASTM A358 / ASTM A671 / ASTM A672 / ASTM A691 / API 5L PSL1/PSL2 / ISO 3183

Arc Welding vs. SAW: 10 Core Parameter Comparison

The following comparison table covers the 10 most critical dimensions for procurement decision-making, designed for supplier evaluation and project selection:

 
Comparison Item Arc Welding Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) Procurement Focus Point
Welding Method Open arc, manual or semi-automatic Covered by flux, fully automatic SAW offers higher consistency
Automation Level Manual / Semi-automatic Fully automatic SAW batch quality is more stable
Welding Speed Moderate High SAW offers higher delivery efficiency
Spatter Level Spatter present, requires post-treatment Virtually no spatter SAW produces a cleaner surface
Weld Consistency Significantly affected by welder skill Stable and consistent Prefer SAW for mass production
Applicable Wall Thickness Primarily thin to medium plates Medium-thick to extra-thick plates Select SAW for thick-walled high-pressure pipes
Applicable Pipe Diameter Flexible, all diameters Best for medium-to-large diameters LSAW is preferred for large diameters
Mechanical Properties Good, depends on welder skill level Superior, controllable parameters Select SAW for high-pressure critical conditions
Production Cost Low equipment cost High initial equipment investment SAW offers better total cost for bulk procurement
Mass Production Capacity Fair Excellent SAW is better suited for large-scale projects

Deep Dive into Weld Performance: Advantages and Risk Control

3.1 Arc Welded Joints: Advantages & Common Risks

Arc welding is mature and adaptable, making it the top choice for field installation and complex structures. However, quality fluctuations caused by manual operation represent its biggest challenge:

 
Quality Dimension Advantage Common Risk Preventive Measure
Welding Flexibility All-position welding, adaptable to complex joints Select appropriate sub-process (GTAW for highest accuracy)
Welder Dependency High impact of welder skill on consistency Strictly execute WPS/PQR and welder qualification assessments
Porosity Risk Porosity prone to occur if shielding is inadequate Check shielding gas purity and electrode storage conditions
Cracking Risk Occurs when cooling rate is too rapid Control preheating and interpass temperatures
Spatter Excessive spatter increases post-treatment workload Optimize FCAW/GMAW parameters
Automation Potential GMAW/FCAW can achieve semi-automation Improve repeatability and precision

3.2 SAW Welded Joints: Advantages & Common Risks

SAW performs exceptionally well in industrial mass production, but full automation does not mean zero risk. Pre-weld qualification and real-time parameter monitoring remain indispensable:

 
Quality Dimension Advantage Common Risk Preventive Measure
Weld Formation Uniform and consistent, controlled reinforcement Regularly calibrate sizing rolls and seam tracking sensors
Penetration Depth Deep penetration, high joint strength Strictly enforce parameters specified in WPS
Mechanical Properties Excellent impact toughness, suitable for low temperatures Manage traceability of welding material batches
Porosity Risk Flux protection, extremely low porosity rate Damp flux may cause porosity Enforce flux drying and storage management
Slag Inclusion Risk Low risk in single-pass welding Incomplete slag removal in multi-pass welding Conduct strict interpass slag cleaning inspections
Cracking Risk Hot cracking occurs if parameters are improper Verify preheating temperature and Carbon Equivalent (CE) value

⚠️ Critical Procurement Note
When procuring SAW steel pipes, do not rely solely on the Mill Test Certificate (MTC). You must simultaneously require WPS/PQR welding procedure qualification documents and NDT inspection reports—all three documents are essential.

Industry Application Scenarios: Which Process to Choose?

There is no absolute superiority between Arc Welding and Submerged Arc Welding; the key lies in matching the process to the specific project requirements:

 
Application Scenario Recommended Process Core Rationale
Structural Steel Work Arc Welding (SMAW/GMAW) High flexibility, simple equipment, high field construction efficiency
Pipeline On-site Installation Arc Welding (GTAW/SMAW) Field operations unrestricted by space, all-position welding capability
Stainless Precision Tubes Arc Welding (GTAW) TIG offers highest weld quality, suitable for high-cleanliness requirements
Storage Tank / Equipment Repair Arc Welding (SMAW/FCAW) Repair scenarios where SAW equipment is unsuitable for field deployment
Oil & Gas Transmission Lines SAW (LSAW) API 5L PSL2, high pressure; LSAW weld seam reliability is unmatched
High-Pressure Steam / Boiler Tubes SAW (LSAW) ASTM A671/A672, thick wall, large diameter; SAW is mandatory
LNG / Cryogenic Engineering SAW (LSAW) Strict low-temperature impact requirements; SAW toughness is more reliable
Offshore Platforms / Subsea Pipelines SAW (LSAW) Dual challenges of high pressure and corrosion; SAW offers stronger long-term durability
Nuclear / Special Engineering SAW + Strict NDT Highest safety level, 100% NDT inspection, maximum weld traceability
Ultra-large Diameters (OD > 600mm) SAW (LSAW/SSAW) Arc welding cannot achieve industrial mass production at this diameter range

Weld Inspection: International Standards & LONGMA’s Control System

5.1 Primary NDT Inspection Methods and Applicable Standards

 
Inspection Method Purpose Primary Standards Applicable Process
Visual Testing (VT) Weld surface profile, geometric defects ISO 17637 / ASTM A530 Arc Welding + SAW
Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Internal cracks, lack of fusion, lamination ASTM E213 / ISO 10893-10 Arc Welding + SAW
Radiographic Testing (RT) Image records of porosity, slag, incomplete penetration ASTM E94 / ISO 10893-7 Primarily used for SAW
Eddy Current Testing (ECT) Surface and near-surface cracks ASTM E309 / ISO 10893-2 Primarily for online ERW
Hydrostatic Testing Verification of tightness and pressure-bearing capacity ASTM A999 / API 5L Arc Welding + SAW
Tensile Testing Verifies weld strength and elongation ASTM A370 Arc Welding + SAW
Bend Testing Verifies weld plastic deformation capacity ASTM A370 Arc Welding + SAW
Charpy V-Notch (CVN) Low-temperature toughness verification ASTM A370 / API 5L PSL2 Primarily for SAW high-pressure pipes

💡 Pro Tip
API 5L PSL2 and ASTM A672 enforce mandatory requirements for NDT coverage ratios, impact test temperatures, and Carbon Equivalent (CE) limits. Specifying only the standard name without designating the product level during procurement may result in testing requirements lower than actual project demands.

5.2 LONGMA In-House Laboratory Full-Process Quality Control

Reliable welded steel pipe quality must be verified by data, not reputation alone. LONGMA’s internal laboratory covers every critical node from raw material entry to finished product dispatch:

 
Inspection Stage Testing Items Quality Control Objective
Raw Material Receiving Chemical composition (OES Spectrum) / PMI / Mechanical properties / Metallographic analysis Verify steel grade, carbon equivalent, and weldability
In-Line Welding Process Current / Voltage / Speed / Heat input / Flux quality / Weld profile Real-time parameter monitoring to ensure full compliance of every weld seam
Finished Product Testing Hydrostatic test / UT / RT / ECT / Tensile / Bend / Impact / Dimensions Comprehensive validation of finished weld seam and pipe body quality
Documentation & Traceability EN 10204 3.1 MTC / NDT reports / Hydrostatic records / WPS/PQR Supports third-party acceptance, project audits, and export customs clearance

LONGMA supports witness inspections by third-party agencies such as SGS, BV, TÜV, and DNV, providing EN 10204 3.1 / 3.2 Material Test Certificates to fulfill strict documentation requirements for various projects and owners.

Selection Decision: 5 Questions to Quickly Target the Right Process

Answering these 5 questions before procurement will help you quickly determine whether Arc Welding or Submerged Arc Welded (SAW) steel pipe is required:

 
Key Question Answer → Arc Welding Answer → Submerged Arc Welding (SAW)
Application: Factory manufacturing or field installation? Field installation / Repair Factory mass production
Pipe Diameter and Wall Thickness? Flexible for all diameters (mostly thin-to-medium) Medium-to-large diameters / Medium-thick to extra-thick
Design Pressure Rating? Low to medium pressure, general fluids High pressure (API 5L X65/X70 and above)
Low-Temperature Impact Testing Required? No low-temperature requirements Specified impact temperature and energy requirements
Applicable Standard? ASTM A53 / AWS D1.1 / Structural standards ASTM A671/A672 / API 5L PSL2 / ISO 3183

💡 Decision Rule
If 3 or more answers point toward Submerged Arc Welding, LSAW is generally the better option. If field construction is the primary condition, the flexibility of Arc Welding (GTAW/SMAW) is irreplaceable.

FAQ: Common Procurement Questions

Q1: Is SAW steel pipe always better in quality than Arc Welded steel pipe?

Not necessarily. Submerged Arc Welding offers clear advantages in industrial mass production, large-diameter thick-walled pipes, and high-pressure applications due to superior weld consistency. Arc welding provides irreplaceable flexibility in field installation, irregular joints, and low-volume processing. Selection should be based on specific project requirements rather than simple process rankings.

Q2: Which is more suitable for high-pressure transmission pipelines, LSAW or SSAW?

High-pressure, long-distance pipelines typically prefer LSAW. LSAW pipes offer high dimensional accuracy, shorter weld seams, uniform wall thickness, and better fusion via double-sided submerged arc welding, making them ideal for high steel grades like API 5L X65/X70. While SSAW offers manufacturing flexibility and lower cost, its spiral weld seam is longer, and certain high-pressure project specifications place additional restrictions on SSAW.

Q3: Besides the MTC, what documents are required when procuring SAW steel pipes?

A complete procurement documentation package for SAW steel pipe should include:
1. EN 10204 3.1 Material Test Certificate (MTC) (covering chemical composition and mechanical properties)
2. WPS/PQR (Welding Procedure Specification / Procedure Qualification Record)
3. NDT Inspection Reports (UT/RT/ECT according to applicable standard/level)
4. Hydrostatic Test Records
5. Dimensional Inspection Report
6. Heat Treatment Records (when required by Class specification)
*For export projects, a Third-Party Inspection (TPI) report should also be attached.*

Q4: How do API 5L PSL1 and PSL2 differ regarding weld inspection requirements?

PSL1 specifies basic chemical and mechanical requirements with relatively flexible NDT and impact test rules. PSL2 mandates Carbon Equivalent (CE) control, 100% inline weld UT inspection, Charpy V-notch impact testing at specified temperatures and minimum energy levels, along with stricter upper limits on chemical composition. High-pressure oil and gas projects should always specify PSL2 to prevent delivery standards from falling short of project needs.

Q5: How can a buyer verify if a supplier genuinely possesses API 5L PSL2 SAW welding capabilities?

You can verify capability through the following steps:
• Request valid WPS/PQR documents (including underlying PQR test records).
• Examine historical NDT report numbering logic and heat number traceability.
• Confirm that production machinery features automated recording of welding parameters.
• Ask for sample historical MTCs for API 5L PSL2 products.
• Arrange a factory audit or pre-shipment witness inspection through third-party agencies like SGS, BV, or TÜV for direct verification.

About LONGMA: Professional Supplier of Arc Welded & SAW Steel Pipes

With over 20 years of expertise in manufacturing ERW and LSAW steel pipes, LONGMA’s core advantage lies in its verifiable, end-to-end quality control system:

  • Multi-Standard Certifications: ASTM A53 / A358 / A671 / A672 / A691 / API 5L (PSL1/PSL2) / ISO 3183
  • Large-Scale LSAW Production: Mass production of large-diameter thick-walled pipes covering API 5L X52 through X70 steel grades
  • Comprehensive In-House Testing: Full coverage of Chemical / PMI / Mechanical / Metallographic / UT / RT / ECT / Hydrostatic testing
  • Complete Welding Qualifications: Fully documented WPS/PQR aligned precisely with steel grades and wall thicknesses
  • Traceable Documentation: EN 10204 3.1 / 3.2 MTCs with full heat-number traceability
  • Third-Party Witness Inspection: Fully supports on-site witnessing and pre-shipment testing by SGS, BV, TÜV, and DNV
  • Customized Services: Anti-corrosion coatings, end preparation, specialized packaging, and OEM project support

If you are currently selecting Arc Welded or SAW steel pipes for your project, contact LONGMA to request: Process Selection Advice · Specification Confirmation · Sample MTCs · NDT Reports · Project Quotations

 

Categories

Get Free Quote

Related Article​

Wechat ID: 008618661500134

Request Free Quote